public site  |  contact  |  join us  |  members only / forms
TODAY IS:
REALTOR® Resources


Code of Ethics Case Studies

Case #8-2: Request for Investigation Filed by Board
with the State Real Estate Commission

REALTOR® A listed Client B's residential property and sold it to Buyer C, who made a substantial deposit subject only to Buyer C's obtaining a mortgage on terms and conditions not exceeding a specified rate of interest within 60 days.

REALTOR® A assisted Buyer C by introducing him to officials of a lending institution, and after processing of his application for a mortgage, a written mortgage commitment was made by the lending institution which met the terms and conditions of the sales agreement. However, shortly after the mortgage commitment was received by Buyer C, REALTOR® A received a certified, return receipt requested letter from Buyer C, advising that Buyer C had changed his mind and would not go through with the sale. REALTOR® A discussed the matter by phone, but Buyer C said he would rather forfeit his deposit and definitely would not complete the sale, even at the risk of the seller suing for specific performance.

REALTOR® A then advised Client B of Buyer C's refusal to go through with the sale and Client B told ® A that he did not wish to sue Buyer C, but would just accept a portion of the forfeited deposit as specified in the listing agreement between Client B and REALTOR® A.

REALTOR® A then obtained a written release from the sale from Client B and Buyer C, and promised to send Client B a check for the portion of the forfeited deposit due to Client B as specified in the listing agreement. However, REALTOR® A failed to send Client B a check and Client B filed a complaint with the Executive Officer of the Board alleging a violation of Article 8 of the Code of Ethics.

At the hearing, Client B stated that he had no complaint about REALTOR® A's services to him except REALTOR® A's failure to provide Client B with the portion of the forfeited deposit due him, and that after several telephone calls and letters, REALTOR® A had told Client B that he would provide the forfeited monies due Client B "just as soon as he could." Client B said REALTOR® A told him he had some unexpected expenses and therefore Client B would have to wait until REALTOR® A obtained other funds which he expected to receive shortly.

REALTOR® A admitted the facts as related and further admitted that he had not placed the deposit received from Buyer C into an escrow account, but had placed it in his general funds. He said that unexpected expenditures had caused a deficit balance in these funds, and he would pay Client B as soon as he could.

What do you think the hearing panel concluded? Show Answer




Register for multiple classes
WED
10/25
1:30 PM - 3:00 PM
Reverse Mortgages
WED
11/01
9:30 AM - 12:30 PM
MD Legislative Update
 
1:30 PM - 3:00 PM
MD Fair Housing
THUR
11/02
9:30 AM - 12:30 PM
MREC Required Supervision
WED
11/08
8:00 AM - 11:00 AM
Legislative Breakfast
 
1:30 PM - 4:30 PM
MREC Agency-Residential
PGCAR's Legislative Impact
Sign up for future calls to action
September Home Sales
PGCAR website advertising
The Voice for Real Estate in Prince George's County
© Copyright 2001-2017 by the Prince George's County Association of REALTORS® Inc.   All Rights Reserved.
Developed and Hosted by CyberVillage Networkers, Inc.

Prince George's County
Association of REALTORS®
9200 Basil Court, Suite 400  |  Largo, MD 20774
Phone 301-306-7900  |  Fax 301-306-8273
info@pgcar.com
PGCAR Facebook link   Full Site link